Tuesday, February 12, 2019

Naked Lunch :: Naked lunch Essays

Naked Lunch   Naked Lunch has been described by the designer as brutal, obscene, and disgusting. It was stated obscene, indecent, and impure... and taken as a whole... predominantly prurient, loyal pornography and utterly without redeeming friendly grandeur, when brought to trial in capital of Massach exampletts in 1965. However, declaring William Burroughs novel to be completely without redeeming social importance seems inaccurate. Naked Lunch paints a vivid portrait of addiction in all its horror, and of the steady degradation of the addicts around whom the novel centers.   Burroughs titles his introduction depositary Testimony Concerning a Sickness. He believes that addiction is a sickness, and feels that addiction should be treated as a physical disorder, not a mental one. The body of the novel is not pornography it is not pointlessly brilliant and obscene. Rather, it uses its brutality and obscenity to portray the destructiveness of addiction. Though it contains detailed descriptions of dose use and even outlines how to use many medicates, it is not a manual for drug use. Rather could be taken as a warning against the employment of such drugs. The novel gives a detailed description of the horrific consequences of addiction, as well as a warning Look down breast DOWN along that junk road before you travel on that point and get in with the Wrong Mob... A word to the wise guy cable (xlv). The novel warns against addiction, against using the drugs described within.   As a warning against drug use and a study of addiction, Naked Lunch has both social and scientific value. During the Boston trial, writers Norman Mailer, Allen Ginsberg, and John Ciardi all testified on behalf of the novel, asseverate its literary importance. When the book was declared not to be obscene by the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, the decision was based on the occurrence that a substantial and intelligent group within the literary conjunction believed that the novel had literary significance (394).   In light of its being considered to throw off not only redeeming social value, but redeeming scientific and literary value as well, Naked Lunch cannot be declared obscene in the legal sense.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.